Scottsdale vs Gilbert: Which Fits Your Life Better?

Scottsdale and Gilbert sit just 30 miles apart in the Phoenix metropolitan area, yet they attract distinctly different households. Scottsdale has built its identity around resort-style living, golf courses, and a retirement-friendly atmosphere, while Gilbert has emerged as one of Arizona’s fastest-growing family suburbs, known for newer construction and highly rated schools. Both cities offer access to the same regional economy and desert climate, but the financial experience of living in each differs in ways that matter for 2026 budgets.

For relocating households, the choice between these two cities often comes down to housing priorities and life stage. Scottsdale’s established neighborhoods and upscale amenities come with a price premium that affects homebuyers more than renters. Gilbert’s family-oriented infrastructure and newer housing stock appeal to dual-income households seeking space and school access without sacrificing proximity to Phoenix employment centers. Understanding where costs concentrate differently—and which households feel those differences most—helps clarify which city aligns better with specific financial situations.

Cost of living comparisons between nearby suburbs can be deceptive when they focus only on averages. In this case, housing values diverge sharply while rents remain similar, utility costs are identical at the rate level, and transportation patterns differ more by employment type than geography. The real question isn’t which city costs less overall, but where financial pressure shows up, how predictable it is, and which trade-offs matter most for your household in 2026.

Housing Costs

Housing represents the most significant cost difference between Scottsdale and Gilbert, but the gap depends entirely on whether you’re renting or buying. Scottsdale’s median home value sits at $651,800, reflecting decades of development as a destination for retirees and second-home buyers. Gilbert’s median home value of $454,300 is nearly $200,000 lower, shaped by rapid suburban expansion over the past two decades that prioritized family-sized homes over resort-style properties. For homebuyers, this difference translates directly into down payment requirements, mortgage payments, and property tax exposure—making Gilbert substantially more accessible for first-time buyers and families stretching toward homeownership.

Renters face a different reality. Scottsdale’s median gross rent is $1,768 per month, while Gilbert’s is $1,839 per month—a $71 difference that falls within normal market variation. This near-parity reflects regional rental demand patterns more than local housing stock differences. Both cities draw renters from the broader Phoenix metro, and landlords price units based on regional comparables rather than neighborhood prestige alone. The rental market in both cities skews toward single-family homes and townhomes rather than large apartment complexes, which keeps pricing relatively uniform despite the home value gap. Renters considering either city should focus less on monthly rent differences and more on unit type, lease terms, and proximity to employment centers.

The housing stock itself differs in ways that affect long-term cost exposure. Scottsdale’s older, more established neighborhoods often feature larger lots, mature landscaping, and HOA-managed amenities like golf courses and clubhouses. These come with ongoing fees and maintenance costs that newer Gilbert developments avoid. Gilbert’s housing stock skews toward construction from the 2000s and 2010s, meaning more energy-efficient builds, modern HVAC systems, and fewer deferred maintenance surprises. For homeowners planning to stay five or more years, Gilbert’s newer construction may reduce utility and repair volatility, while Scottsdale’s established character appeals to those prioritizing location prestige and resort-style community features over operational efficiency.

These differences create distinct fit profiles. First-time homebuyers and young families face lower barriers to entry in Gilbert, where the home value gap translates into smaller down payments and more manageable mortgage obligations. Scottsdale’s higher home values appeal to move-up buyers, retirees downsizing from larger markets, and households prioritizing established neighborhoods over new construction. Renters experience similar monthly costs in both cities, making location, commute, and neighborhood character more decisive than rent levels alone. The housing decision between these two cities hinges less on affordability in absolute terms and more on which type of housing pressure—ownership cost vs. rental availability—dominates your household’s financial planning.

Housing takeaway: Homebuyers face a $197,000 median price gap that makes Gilbert significantly more accessible for ownership, while renters encounter near-identical monthly costs. Scottsdale’s housing premium reflects established character and resort-style amenities; Gilbert’s lower entry point reflects newer construction and family-oriented development. Households sensitive to down payment size and mortgage leverage will find Gilbert more accommodating, while those prioritizing neighborhood prestige and mature landscaping may justify Scottsdale’s premium. Renters should focus on unit type and commute rather than rent level, as the $71 difference is negligible compared to other decision factors.

Utilities and Energy Costs

Utility costs in Scottsdale and Gilbert start from an identical baseline: both cities pay 15.55¢ per kWh for electricity and $23.77 per MCF for natural gas, as they share the same regional utility providers and rate structures. This eliminates rate-level differences and shifts the cost comparison entirely to usage patterns, which are shaped by housing age, square footage, and household behavior rather than city boundaries. In the Phoenix metro’s desert climate, cooling dominates utility exposure from May through September, while heating needs remain modest and concentrated in December and January. Both cities experience the same seasonal intensity, meaning the primary driver of utility cost differences is how efficiently individual homes manage that exposure.

Gilbert’s newer housing stock provides a structural advantage in energy efficiency. Homes built in the 2000s and later typically include better insulation, dual-pane windows, and more efficient HVAC systems than Scottsdale’s older neighborhoods, where construction from the 1980s and 1990s is common. This doesn’t eliminate cooling costs—summer temperatures still drive significant electricity usage—but it reduces the volatility and unpredictability that older homes experience when aging systems struggle during peak heat. Families in Gilbert’s newer developments may find utility bills more stable month-to-month, while Scottsdale homeowners in older properties may face sharper spikes during extreme weather or when HVAC systems near the end of their service life.

Household size and home type amplify these differences. Single-family homes in both cities carry higher baseline utility costs than townhomes or apartments, simply due to square footage and the number of exterior walls exposed to heat. Larger families running multiple loads of laundry, keeping lights on in more rooms, and cooling more square footage will feel utility pressure more acutely than single adults or couples. In Scottsdale, this pressure is compounded by larger lot sizes and mature landscaping that may require irrigation, adding water costs to the utility mix. Gilbert’s more compact lot sizes and xeriscape-friendly landscaping reduce water usage, though this varies widely by neighborhood and HOA requirements.

Predictability matters as much as price level. Scottsdale’s older homes introduce more maintenance-driven volatility—an aging water heater, a failing AC compressor, or poor attic insulation can turn a manageable summer bill into a budget shock. Gilbert’s newer construction reduces these surprises, though it doesn’t eliminate them entirely. Both cities benefit from utility programs that offer off-peak rate structures and efficiency rebates, but these require proactive enrollment and behavior changes that not all households adopt. The key difference is that Gilbert’s housing stock makes efficiency easier to achieve by default, while Scottsdale’s older homes require more intentional upgrades to reach the same level of cost control.

Utility takeaway: Both cities share identical electricity and natural gas rates, so cost differences come down to housing age and efficiency. Gilbert’s newer construction provides more predictable utility costs and lower cooling exposure, while Scottsdale’s older homes introduce more volatility and potential for seasonal spikes. Families in larger homes and those in older Scottsdale neighborhoods face the highest utility pressure, while single adults or couples in newer Gilbert townhomes experience the lowest. The decision isn’t about which city has cheaper utilities—it’s about whether your housing choice in each city sets you up for predictable or variable energy costs.

Groceries and Daily Expenses

Grocery and everyday spending costs in Scottsdale and Gilbert are shaped by the same regional price environment, as both cities fall within the Phoenix metro’s 106 RPP index—meaning prices run about 6% above the national baseline. This regional parity eliminates city-level price differences for staples like milk, eggs, and bread, and shifts the cost experience toward access, shopping habits, and household volume. Both cities offer a mix of big-box retailers, regional grocery chains, and specialty stores, but the concentration and convenience of those options differ in ways that affect how often households pay premium prices for convenience versus planning ahead for volume savings.

Scottsdale’s retail landscape includes more upscale grocery options and specialty stores catering to retirees and higher-income households. This doesn’t mean staples cost more across the board, but it does mean the temptation to spend on prepared foods, organic selections, and premium brands is more visible and accessible. Households that prioritize convenience—grabbing dinner from a deli counter, picking up pre-cut vegetables, or shopping at boutique markets—will find Scottsdale’s retail environment accommodating but expensive. Gilbert’s retail mix skews more toward family-oriented big-box stores and warehouse clubs, where bulk purchasing and meal planning yield more savings. Families managing larger grocery volumes—multiple gallons of milk per week, bulk proteins, and pantry staples—benefit more from Gilbert’s access to volume-friendly retailers.

Dining out and convenience spending follow similar patterns. Scottsdale’s restaurant scene includes more upscale and resort-adjacent dining, where a casual dinner for two can easily exceed $60 before drinks. Gilbert’s dining options lean toward family chains, fast-casual concepts, and takeout-friendly spots where the same meal costs $35–$45. This difference compounds over time for households that eat out frequently or rely on takeout during busy weeks. Single adults and couples who dine out regularly will feel this gap more than families who cook at home most nights, but even occasional dining adds up when Scottsdale’s baseline is consistently higher.

Household size determines how much grocery and daily expense differences matter. Single adults and couples can absorb small price variations more easily, as their total grocery spend remains modest even with occasional premium purchases. Families with children face sharper cost sensitivity, as volume needs multiply every price difference—buying four gallons of milk instead of one, or feeding five people instead of two, turns small per-unit costs into significant weekly totals. Gilbert’s access to bulk retailers and family-oriented shopping infrastructure makes it easier to manage these volumes without constant price vigilance, while Scottsdale’s retail mix rewards smaller households who value convenience and variety over volume savings.

Groceries takeaway: Both cities share the same regional price baseline, so cost differences come from shopping habits and access rather than price levels. Scottsdale’s upscale retail environment and dining scene introduce more opportunities for premium spending, while Gilbert’s family-oriented big-box access favors volume purchasing and meal planning. Families managing large grocery volumes and frequent dining out will feel more pressure in Scottsdale, while single adults and couples who prioritize convenience and variety may find Scottsdale’s options worth the premium. The decision hinges on whether your household’s spending patterns align with volume savings or convenience-driven flexibility.

Taxes and Fees

Property taxes represent the most significant tax difference between Scottsdale and Gilbert, driven entirely by the $197,000 gap in median home values. Arizona’s property tax system applies similar assessment ratios and rates across Maricopa County, meaning the primary variable is the assessed value of the home itself. A $651,800 home in Scottsdale generates a substantially higher annual property tax bill than a $454,300 home in Gilbert, even when effective rates remain comparable. For homeowners, this difference translates into ongoing monthly obligations that compound over years of ownership—making Gilbert’s lower entry point even more advantageous for households managing tight budgets or planning to stay long-term.

Sales taxes in both cities are effectively identical, as they share the same state, county, and regional transit district rates. This eliminates any meaningful difference in consumption-based tax exposure, whether you’re buying groceries, dining out, or purchasing a car. The uniformity of sales tax across the Phoenix metro means households can’t reduce tax burdens by choosing one city over the other—what matters more is total spending volume, which is shaped by income, household size, and lifestyle choices rather than city boundaries.

HOA fees and special assessments introduce more variability and depend heavily on neighborhood rather than city. Scottsdale’s established communities often feature higher HOA fees, particularly in resort-style developments with golf courses, clubhouses, and extensive landscaping. These fees can range from $200 to $600 per month or more, depending on amenities and the age of the community’s infrastructure. Gilbert’s newer developments also include HOAs, but fees tend to be lower—often $50 to $150 per month—and cover more basic services like front yard landscaping and community pool maintenance. For homeowners, these recurring fees represent a predictable monthly cost that doesn’t fluctuate with home value but does vary significantly by neighborhood character and amenity level.

Renters are largely insulated from property tax and HOA differences, as landlords absorb these costs and price them into rent. The near-identical rent levels between Scottsdale and Gilbert suggest that landlords in both cities face similar total cost structures, even though the underlying tax and fee components differ. Renters should focus more on what’s included in their lease—whether utilities, trash, or parking are bundled—rather than worrying about the tax burden their landlord carries. Homeowners, by contrast, face direct exposure to property taxes and HOAs, making these costs a critical part of the ownership decision between the two cities.

Taxes and fees takeaway: Property taxes favor Gilbert due to lower home values, while sales taxes remain identical across both cities. HOA fees vary more by neighborhood than by city, but Scottsdale’s resort-style communities tend to charge higher monthly fees for premium amenities. Homeowners face the most significant tax and fee differences, with Scottsdale’s higher property taxes and HOA costs compounding over time. Renters experience minimal tax-related differences, as these costs are embedded in rent rather than billed separately. Households planning long-term ownership should factor property tax and HOA exposure into their total cost analysis, as these recurring costs can rival or exceed monthly mortgage principal over a 30-year timeline.

Transportation & Commute Reality

Commute times in Scottsdale and Gilbert are statistically identical, with both cities averaging 25 minutes each way. This similarity reflects their shared position as suburban nodes within the Phoenix metro, where most employment centers are concentrated in Phoenix, Tempe, and the East Valley. The average commute time, however, masks meaningful differences in how residents actually get to work and how much flexibility they have in managing transportation costs. Gilbert shows a 6.8% work-from-home rate, nearly three times Scottsdale’s 2.5%, suggesting that Gilbert households have more access to remote work arrangements that reduce commute frequency and transportation exposure.

Both cities are car-dependent by design, with limited public transit options and sprawling residential layouts that make walking or biking impractical for most commutes. Gas prices are identical at $3.04 per gallon, as both cities draw from the same regional fuel market. The real cost difference comes from how often households need to drive and how far they travel beyond the daily commute. Scottsdale’s position on the northern edge of the metro means some residents commute south into Phoenix or Tempe, while others work locally in Scottsdale’s own employment hubs. Gilbert’s location on the eastern side of the metro places it closer to Chandler and Mesa employment centers, but farther from downtown Phoenix. Households commuting to central Phoenix from either city face similar drive times, but those working in the East Valley may find Gilbert more convenient.

Long commutes—defined as 60 minutes or more each way—affect 18.6% of Scottsdale workers and 19.4% of Gilbert workers, a negligible difference that suggests both cities include a mix of local workers and long-distance commuters. These longer commutes typically involve travel to Phoenix’s downtown core, Sky Harbor Airport area, or even cross-metro trips to the West Valley. For households where one or both adults fall into this category, transportation costs extend beyond gas to include vehicle wear, time lost to driving, and the mental load of managing long daily drives. The higher remote work rate in Gilbert offers a partial offset, as households with even one remote worker can reduce total vehicle miles and extend the time between maintenance intervals.

Transportation cost exposure scales with household size and employment patterns. Single-income households with one commuter face lower transportation costs than dual-income households where both adults drive daily. Families with teenagers add another vehicle and driver to the mix, multiplying fuel, insurance, and maintenance costs. Gilbert’s higher remote work rate and proximity to East Valley employment centers may reduce transportation pressure for dual-income families, while Scottsdale’s older demographic and lower remote work rate suggest more traditional commute patterns. Neither city offers a meaningful transit alternative, so the decision between them hinges on where you work, how often you need to drive, and whether remote work flexibility reduces your household’s total vehicle dependence.

Cost Structure Comparison

Housing dominates the cost structure difference between Scottsdale and Gilbert, but the impact depends entirely on whether you’re renting or buying. Homebuyers in Scottsdale face a $197,000 higher median price, which translates into larger down payments, higher monthly mortgage obligations, and greater property tax exposure. This premium reflects Scottsdale’s established character, resort-style amenities, and decades of development as a retirement destination. Gilbert’s lower home values make ownership more accessible for first-time buyers and families, particularly those stretching to afford a single-family home with yard space and access to highly rated schools. Renters, by contrast, encounter nearly identical monthly costs in both cities, meaning the housing decision for renters hinges more on neighborhood fit and commute convenience than on monthly budget pressure.

Utilities introduce minimal cost differences at the rate level, as both cities share identical electricity and natural gas pricing. The real distinction comes from housing age and efficiency. Gilbert’s newer construction reduces cooling costs and utility volatility, while Scottsdale’s older homes introduce more seasonal spikes and maintenance-driven surprises. Families in larger homes—particularly those in older Scottsdale neighborhoods—face the highest utility exposure, while single adults or couples in newer Gilbert townhomes experience the most predictable bills. This difference doesn’t show up as a line item on a comparison chart, but it affects how much financial cushion households need to absorb summer cooling spikes or unexpected HVAC repairs.

Daily living costs—groceries, dining out, and convenience spending—are shaped more by household behavior than by city-level price differences. Both cities share the same regional price baseline, but Scottsdale’s upscale retail environment and dining scene create more opportunities for premium spending. Families managing large grocery volumes and frequent takeout orders will feel more pressure in Scottsdale, where convenience-oriented options skew more expensive. Gilbert’s family-oriented big-box access and chain restaurant mix favor volume purchasing and budget-conscious meal planning. The difference isn’t about one city being cheaper—it’s about which retail and dining infrastructure aligns better with your household’s spending habits and priorities.

Transportation patterns differ more by employment type than by geography. Both cities average 25-minute commutes and rely almost entirely on personal vehicles, but Gilbert’s higher remote work rate (6.8% vs. 2.5%) suggests more households have flexibility to reduce commute frequency. This doesn’t eliminate transportation costs, but it does reduce total vehicle miles and extend the time between maintenance intervals. Households with two daily commuters face higher transportation exposure in both cities, but those with even one remote worker gain more cost control in Gilbert. The decision isn’t about which city has shorter commutes—it’s about whether your employment situation allows you to reduce driving frequency and whether that flexibility matters for your household budget.

The better choice depends on which costs dominate your household’s financial picture. Homebuyers sensitive to down payment size and monthly mortgage obligations will find Gilbert more accommodating, while those prioritizing neighborhood prestige and established amenities may justify Scottsdale’s premium. Renters face similar monthly costs in both cities, making location and lifestyle fit more decisive than rent levels. Families managing large grocery volumes, multiple vehicles, and utility-intensive homes will feel more pressure in Scottsdale, while single adults and couples who value convenience and upscale options may find Scottsdale’s retail and dining environment worth the extra spending. For households where predictability matters more than absolute price level, Gilbert’s newer construction and family-oriented infrastructure offer more cost stability. For those where lifestyle and location prestige outweigh budget sensitivity, Scottsdale’s established character and resort-style amenities justify the higher entry point.

Lifestyle Fit

Scottsdale and Gilbert offer distinctly different lifestyle experiences despite their proximity within the Phoenix metro. Scottsdale’s identity centers on resort-style living, with over 200 golf courses, upscale shopping districts like Scottsdale Fashion Square, and a thriving arts scene anchored by galleries and the Scottsdale Museum of Contemporary Art. The city attracts retirees, second-home buyers, and households prioritizing walkable downtown areas, outdoor dining, and access to Sonoran Desert hiking trails. Gilbert, by contrast, has built its reputation as one of Arizona’s most family-friendly suburbs, with highly rated schools, newer parks and recreation facilities, and a downtown area that hosts regular farmers markets and community events. The lifestyle difference is less about urban versus suburban—both cities are fundamentally car-dependent—and more about whether your priorities align with established amenities and resort character or newer infrastructure and family-oriented programming.

Commute times are identical at 25 minutes on average, but the destinations differ. Scottsdale residents often work locally in the city’s own employment hubs—healthcare, hospitality, and professional services—or commute south into Tempe and Phoenix. Gilbert residents are more likely to work in the East Valley’s tech and manufacturing corridor, including Chandler and Mesa, or commute west into Phoenix’s downtown core. Neither city offers meaningful public transit, so walkability is limited to specific neighborhoods rather than city-wide infrastructure. Scottsdale’s Old Town district and some master-planned communities include pedestrian-friendly streets and mixed-use development, while Gilbert’s downtown area and newer subdivisions offer sidewalks and bike lanes but require driving for most errands. Households prioritizing walkability should focus on specific neighborhoods rather than assuming either city delivers car-free convenience.

Recreation and outdoor access reflect each city’s demographic focus. Scottsdale’s extensive trail system, including access to the McDowell Sonoran Preserve, appeals to hikers, mountain bikers, and outdoor enthusiasts who value desert landscapes and year-round sunshine. The city’s golf courses and resort amenities cater to retirees and visitors, creating a leisure-oriented atmosphere that some households find appealing and others find too tourist-heavy. Gilbert’s parks and recreation facilities skew toward families, with splash pads, sports leagues, and community centers designed for children and teens. The city’s newer development means more modern playgrounds and well-maintained green spaces, though the desert climate limits lush landscaping. Households with young children will find Gilbert’s infrastructure more accommodating, while empty nesters and retirees may prefer Scottsdale’s mature amenities and established cultural scene.

Quick facts: Scottsdale’s unemployment rate sits at 3.1%, identical to Gilbert’s, reflecting the broader Phoenix metro’s stable job market. Gilbert’s median household income of $115,179 per year exceeds Scottsdale’s $104,197, suggesting more dual-income families and younger working-age households. Scottsdale’s designation as a retirement city shapes its commercial mix and community programming, while Gilbert’s family orientation drives school funding and youth-focused amenities.

Lifestyle factors indirectly affect costs in ways that don’t show up on a budget spreadsheet. Scottsdale’s walkable Old Town and resort amenities reduce the need for entertainment spending outside the city, but they also create more temptation for upscale dining and shopping. Gilbert’s family-oriented infrastructure encourages more home-based activities and community events, which can lower entertainment costs but require more investment in home amenities like backyard play equipment or pool maintenance. Scottsdale’s older housing stock and mature landscaping require more ongoing maintenance, while Gilbert’s newer construction reduces repair surprises but may come with higher HOA fees for community amenities. The lifestyle decision between these two cities isn’t just about where you want to live—it’s about which cost structure and spending pattern aligns better with how your household actually uses space, time, and money.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Scottsdale or Gilbert more expensive for homebuyers in 2026?

Scottsdale is significantly more expensive for homebuyers, with a median home value of $651,800 compared to Gilbert’s $454,300—a $197,000 difference. This gap affects down payment requirements, monthly mortgage payments, and property tax exposure. First-time buyers and families stretching to afford ownership will find Gilbert more accessible, while move-up buyers and retirees prioritizing established neighborhoods may justify Scottsdale’s premium. Renters face nearly identical costs in both cities, with Scottsdale’s median rent at $1,768 per month and Gilbert’s at $1,839 per month.

Do Scottsdale and Gilbert have the same utility costs in 2026?

Both cities share identical electricity rates (15.55¢/kWh) and natural gas prices ($23.77/MCF), as they draw from the same regional utility providers. Cost differences come from housing age and efficiency rather than rate structures. Gilbert’s newer construction reduces cooling costs and utility volatility, while Scottsdale’s older homes introduce more seasonal spikes and maintenance-driven surprises. Families in larger homes and those in older Scottsdale neighborhoods face the highest utility exposure, while households in newer Gilbert townhomes experience more predictable bills.

Which city is better for families comparing Scottsdale and Gilbert in 2026?

Gilbert is better suited for families prioritizing school access, newer construction, and family-oriented infrastructure. The city’s lower home values make ownership more accessible, and its parks, recreation facilities, and community programming cater to children and teens. Gilbert’s higher median household income ($115,179 vs. Scottsdale’s $104,197) reflects more dual-income families and working-age households. Scottsdale appeals to families who prioritize established neighborhoods, resort-style amenities, and access to outdoor recreation, but its higher home values and upscale retail environment introduce more cost pressure for budget-conscious households.

How do commute and transportation costs compare between Scottsdale and Gilbert in 2026?

Both cities average 25-minute commutes and rely almost entirely on personal vehicles, with identical gas prices at $3.04 per gallon. The key difference is remote work flexibility: Gilbert’s 6.8% work-from-home rate is nearly three times Scottsdale’s 2.5%, suggesting more households can reduce commute frequency and transportation exposure. Long commutes (60+ minutes) affect 18.6% of Scottsdale workers and 19.4% of Gilbert workers, a negligible difference. Transportation costs scale with household size and employment patterns—dual-income households with two daily commuters face higher exposure in both cities, but those with remote work flexibility gain more cost control in Gilbert.

What are the biggest cost surprises when moving from Scottsdale to Gilbert or vice versa in 2026?

The biggest surprise is that rent costs are nearly identical despite a $197,000 gap in home values, meaning renters experience minimal financial difference while homebuyers face vastly different entry points. Another surprise: Scottsdale’s upscale retail and dining environment creates more opportunities for premium spending, even though both cities share the same regional price baseline for groceries. Finally, Gilbert’s higher median household income ($115,179 vs. $104,197) suggests more dual-income families and working-age households, while Scottsdale’s retirement-oriented character shapes its commercial mix and community programming in ways that affect daily spending patterns beyond housing costs alone.

Conclusion

Scottsdale and Gilbert offer different financial experiences shaped by housing values, demographic character, and infrastructure age rather than regional price differences. Homebuyers face a $197,000 median price gap that makes Gilbert significantly more accessible for ownership, while renters encounter nearly identical monthly costs in both cities. Scottsdale’s established neighborhoods, resort-style amenities, and upscale retail environment appeal to retirees and households prioritizing prestige over price sensitivity. Gilbert’s newer construction, family-oriente